|
|
John 1:13 explains that those who are born again were born "not of blood nor of the will of the flesh nor of the will of man, but of God". Calvinists believe that this is a clear-cut verse showing that God regenerates us, and does not do so based on an act of decision by our will. In response to this however, a visitor to OldTruth.com by the name of James, says: "Verse 12 makes it abundantly clear that 'the power to become children of God' (becoming a child of God is via the new birth -- regeneration) is contingent upon 'receiving Christ' and 'believing on His name'."
James continues by saying . . . "Verse 13, which you cited, then goes on to say that those who 'receive Him' and 'believe on his name' are the ones who are 'born of God'. Clearly, believing and receiving are shown not to be "of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God." Receiving Christ precedes regeneration in the sense that the latter is conditioned upon the former."
To cut down on confusion, lets see both of these verses in John 1 together, 12 But to all who did receive him, who believed in his name, he gave the right to become children of God, 13 who were born, not of blood nor of the will of the flesh nor of the will of man, but of God. The assumption that I think James is making here is that since verse 12 (receive and believe) comes before verse 13 (were born), then that must mean that receiving/believing is an action prior to being born again. So then, this viewpoint would have us believe that receiving/believing CAUSES us to be born again. But the words "who were born" at the start of verse 13 establishes the verse as coming before verse 12 in the order of salvation. So because of the phrase who were born, we can see that being born comes first. This seems to support, rather than contradict, other passages relating to the new birth such as 1 Peter 1:3 "He has caused us to be born again to a living hope". Vincent Cheung gives this analysis of John 1:12-13 The passage indicates that regeneration does not occur by belonging to a particular bloodline, nor does it occur by John MacArthur further comments on this passage in one of his sermons: "I think it's fair to say that salvation is not based on what man or woman does, and are you ready for this, it's not even based on what a man or woman decides in the purest sense, John 1:12, "As many as received Him, to them He gave the right to become children of God, even to those who believe in His name." Listen to this, "Who were born...that's speaking of their new birth, their salvation...not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man but...what?...of God...of God."
Lastly, here's John Piper on this verse: Additional Reading on This Topic:
|
|
+Contemporary: +From History: Jonathan Edwards
Answering claims of anti-Calvinists:
Statements of inconsistency
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||